BILL OF COMPLAINT
UCC §
9-210. STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT 4 Million
If
you find yourself in receipt of this Bill of Complaint you are
demanded to answer the questions within 10 days
Pursuant
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 (b) (6), your failure to deny
the below within 10 days constitutes an admission to each question.
Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 6065 your answer must be signed under penalty
of perjury
AFFIDAVIT
OF DURESS
Admit
THAT It
is a fact that government, financial institutions, and private
employers within your jurisdiction universally require ID of some
kind in order to authenticate those they do business with. There is
nothing fundamentally wrong with this general practice in and of
itself. HOWEVER, this practice has been unlawfully perverted and
abused by state and federal governments alike to criminally promote
their financial gain to the extreme, unlawful, and unconstitutional
detriment of those in the public they are supposed to be protecting
by the following methods:
1.
Admit You have transformed the process of issuance of state ID into
a privilege and a franchise that causes not only a surrender of
rights, but of ALL rights, as a precondition of being able to conduct
commerce within your jurisdiction, such as banking, private
employment, etc. 18 US Code 3571 ,$250,000,000
"It
has long been established that a State may not impose a penalty upon
those who exercise a right guaranteed by the Constitution."
Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of California, 271
U.S. 583. "Constitutional rights would be of little value if
they could be indirectly denied,' Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649,
644, or manipulated out of existence,' Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364
U.S. 339, 345." [Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528 at 540, 85
S.Ct. 1177, 1185 (1965)]
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
This
is done by:
1.1.
Compelling the use of Social Security Numbers and/or Taxpayer
Identification Numbers as a precondition of obtaining ID. These
numbers make the holder into a public officer and a federal
instrumentality on official business and engaged in a federal
franchise. People domiciled in a state of the Union are NOT eligible
for these numbers. 18 US Code 3571, Felony
$250,000,000 See:
1.1.1.
Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee,
FREE9628.WORDPRESS.COM
1.2.
Requiring those applying and who are domiciled in the exclusive
jurisdiction of a Constitutional but not Statutory “State” to
falsely admit that they are statutory “U.S. citizens” (8 U.S.C.
1401) or “U.S. residents” (aliens pursuant to 26
U.S.C.7701(b)(1)(A)) with a domicile on federal territory and
therefore not protected by the Constitution. Those domiciled on
federal territory have NO rights. 18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
“Indeed,
the practical interpretation put by Congress upon the Constitution
has been long continued and uniform to the effect [182 U.S. 244, 279]
that the Constitution is applicable to
territories acquired by purchase or conquest, only when and so far as
Congress shall so direct. Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to
every state in this Union a republican form of government' (art. 4,
4), by which we understand, according to the definition of Webster,
'a government in which the supreme power resides in the whole body of
the people, and is exercised by representatives elected by them,'
Congress did not hesitate, in the original organization of the
territories of Louisiana, Florida, the Northwest Territory, and its
subdivisions of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, and Wisconsin and
still more recently in the case of Alaska, to establish a form of
government bearing a much greater analogy to a British Crown colony
than a republican state of America, and to
vest the legislative power either in a governor and council, or a
governor and judges, to be appointed by the President. It was not
until they had attained a certain population that power was given
them to organize a legislature by vote of the people. In all these
cases, as well as in territories subsequently organized west of the
Mississippi, Congress thought it necessary either to extend to
Constitution and laws of the United States over them, or to declare
that the inhabitants should be entitled to enjoy the right of trial
by jury, of bail, and of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus,
as well as other privileges of the bill of rights.” [Downes v.
Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
1.3.Admit
that by Refusing to issue state ID to those who claim to be
“nonresidents” in relation to the following, in violation of the
equal protection of the law, whereby the Constitution itself is the
law in question that I am being protected by.
1.3.1.
Federal territory.
1.3.2.
The “United States” as defined in 26 U.S.C.7701(a)(9) and
(a)(10).and who instead are domiciled in the de jure state that has
no jurisdiction over federal territory,
1.4.
Making all those applying for state driver’s licenses into
“residents” (aliens), meaning privileged aliens with a domicile
on federal territory not protected by the Constitution. 18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
2.
Admit that You have tried to conceal and protect the illegal and
criminal acts associated with the government ID and identity theft
scam by:
2.1.
Not providing definitions of the word “resident” in the vehicle
code so that it can conveniently and wrongfully be confused with a
“resident” in the revenue code. 18 US Code
3571, Felony $250,000,000
2.2.
Confusing a “resident” within the vehicle code with a “resident”
in the state or federal revenue code. The two are NOT the same. A
“resident” in the revenue code is, in fact, a resident alien and
NOT a statutory “U.S. citizen” pursuant to 8 U.S.C.1401 or a
constitutional “citizen of the United States” as described in
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. 18 US
Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
2.3.
Interfering with or prosecuting efforts such as this to remove the
duress described in this section.
2.4.
Harassing those domiciled within a de jure state of the Union who
lawfully apply for USA passports as Constitutional but not Statutory
citizens by impeding issuance without explanation and demanding
further information that is not authorized by law and using that
information to engage in “selective enforcement” against those
who demand their rights. 18 US Code 3571,
Felony $250,000,000 See:
Getting
A USA Passport as a “state national”, Free9628.wordpress.com
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
3
Admit . You have abused and continue to willfully abuse private
institutions that are not part of the government but who are acting
as “public officers” under your jurisdiction as a recruitment
vehicle for non-consensually converting private 1human beings into
“public officers” engaged in federal franchises. Such methods
include, but are not limited to the 1following methods directed
against those not in possession of government ID that falsely
portrays their status as domiciliaries of the federal zone called
statutory “U.S. citizens” (8 U.S.C. 1401) or “U.S. residents”
(aliens with a domicile on federal territory pursuant to 26 U.S.C.
7701(b)(1)(A)): 18 US Code 3571, Felony
$250,000,000
3.1
Admit. Private institutions basically boycotting and refusing to
provide private service for those without fraudulent government ID.
They are doing so in the alleged capacity as “withholding agents”
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(16), and therefore are subject to
the constitutional constraints applying to all government
instrumentality. 18 US Code 3571, Felony
$250,000,000
3.2.
State and federal governments refusing to publish or enforce
standards for the issuance of lawful PRIVATE ID by PRIVATE PARTIES
not directly associated with the government or with government
franchises.18 US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
State
and federal governments refusing to prosecute financial
institutions and employers who discriminate against or deny service
to those who form their own government and issue their own private
ID, or who have “foreign ID” that they don’t want to
recognize. 18 US Code 3571, Felony
$250,000,000
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
Admit
The end result of the illegal and unconstitutional government ID scam
documented above is that people you are supposed to be protecting the
sovereignty and constitutional rights of are extorted and threatened
with removal of all ability to participate in commercial transactions
and to support themselves and their families unless they: 18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
1.
Commit fraud on a government form by describing themselves as
statutory “U.S. citizens” (8 U.S.C. 1401) or “U.S. 31residents”
(8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(3) and 26 U.S.C. 7701(b)(1)(A)) 18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
2.
Conspire to defraud the U.S. government in criminal violation of 18
U.S.C. 371 by signing up for franchises that they are not eligible
for as nonresidents domiciled in a foreign state and not subject to
the federal franchises. 20 C.F.R. 34 422.104 says that only statutory
but not constitutional “U.S. citizens” (8 U.S.C. 401) and
“permanent residents” are 3eligible to participate, and those
citizens and residents are domiciles of federal territory that is no
part of any state of the Union. 18 US Code
3571, Felony $250,000,000
3.
Subjecting themselves to involuntary servitude by donating everything
they own to a public use, public purpose, and public office by
connecting it with government property (20 C.F.R. 422.103(d)) in the
form of a TIN or SSN.
4.
Aiding and abetting the state and federal governments to
unconstitutionally break down the separation of powers between them.
This compels me to serve two masters who are part of one monolithic
“U.S. Inc.” corporation that isn’t even a government, but a
private corporation.18 US Code 3571, Felony
$250,000,000 Se
4.1.
Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, ,
Free9628.wordpress.com .18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
4.2.
Corporatization and Privatization of the Government,
Free9628.wordpress.com
Such an approach and conspiracy against my Constitutional rights is:
1.
Anathema to the whole notion of a free society.
2.
Creates an unconstitutional “title of nobility” in public
servants and the creation of a privileged class.
United
States Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 No
Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no
Person holding any Office
of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the
Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any
kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. .18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
3.
Transforms a government based on individual rights and personal
sovereignty into a “dulocracy”, whereby public servants have so
much license and privilege that they domineer over people that they
are supposed to be serving and protecting: .18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
“Dulocracy.
A government where servants and slaves have so much license and
privilege that they domineer.” [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth
Edition, p. 501]
4.
Compels sovereign Americans into becoming government public officers
and instrumentalities without their consent and without compensation.
.18 US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
5.
Illegally and under threat and extortion compels the average American
to contract with the government. All franchises such as Social
Security and the income tax are contracts between the grantor and the
grantee. .18
US Code 3571, Felony $250,000,000
As
a rule, franchises spring from contracts between the sovereign power
and private citizens,
made upon valuable considerations, for purposes of individual
advantage as well as public benefit, and thus a franchise partakes of
a double nature and character. So far
as it affects or concerns the public, it is publici juris and is
subject to governmental control. The legislature may prescribe the
manner of granting it, to whom it may be granted, the conditions and
terms upon which it may be held, and the duty of the grantee to the
public in exercising it, and may also provide for its forfeiture upon
the failure of the grantee to perform that duty. But when granted, it
becomes the property of the grantee, and is a private right, subject
only to the governmental control growing out of its other nature as
publici juris. [American
Jurisprudence 2d,Franchises,4:Generally(1999)]
YOUR
ANSWER (circle one) Admit/ Deny
CLARIFICATION__________________________________________________________________________________
For
further details, see:
5.1.
The “Trade or Business” Scam,
Free9628.wordpress.com
5.2.
Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee,
Free9628.wordpress.com
6.
Causes identity theft whereby the legal identity of those domiciled
in states of the Union is effectively kidnapped from the protections
of the Constitution and transported to a foreign jurisdiction and
federal territory not protected by the Constitution pursuant to
U.S.C.7408(d) and 26 U.S.C.7701(a)(39). THIS is a very serious crime
if the party who is the victim, such as me, does not consent to the
theft. Statutes making identity theft a criminal infraction and which
you are subject to include:
6.1.
18 U.S.C.912: Impersonating a public officer.
6.2.
42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)(i): Evidence, Procedure, and Certification for
payments
6.3.
42 U.S.C. 408(a)(7): Penalties 39
6.4.
18 U.S.C. 1028(a)(7): Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information
6.5.
18 U.S.C.1028A: Aggravated Identity Theft 42
6.6.
18 U.S.C. 654: Anyone who uses a public number in connection with
your private property without your consent is guilty of conversion.
To
make things even worse, the Department of Homeland Security
fraudulently and maliciously labels all those who are aware of the
Government ID Scam described herein as “terrorists” and
“extremists”, as though knowledge of your unlawful
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Georgia
R. & Power Co. v. Atlanta, 154 Ga. 731, 115 S.E. 263; Lippencott
v. Allander, 27 Iowa 460; State ex rel. Hutton v. Baton Rouge, 217 La
857, 47 So.2d. 665; Tower v. Tower & S. Street R. Co., 68 Minn
500, 71 N.W. 691.
54
Georgia R. & Power Co. v. Atlanta, 154 Ga. 731, 115 S.E. 263;
Lippencott v. Allander, 27 Iowa 460; State ex rel. Hutton v. Baton
Rouge, 217 La 857, 47 So.2d. 665; Tower v. Tower & S. Street R.
Co., 68 Minn 500, 71 N.W. 691.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
efforts
to compel association, compel contracting, and compel fraudulent
participation in your franchises is an illegal activity.
What
a SICK JOKE. The real terrorists are any state and federal government
that compels me to lie on a government form about my status in order
to procure the benefits of a franchise that I don’t want, don’t
need, and which is actually harmful and not protective of me.
(U)
sovereign citizen movement : (U//FOUO) 5
A
right wing extremist movement composed of groups or individuals who
reject the notion of U.S. citizenship. They claim to follow only what
they believe to be God’s law or common law and the original 10
amendments (Bill of Rights) to the U.S. Constitution. They believe
they are emancipated from all other responsibilities associated with
being a U.S. citizen, such as paying taxes, possessing a driver’s
license and motor vehicle registration, or 1holding a social security
number. They generally do not recognize federal or state 1government
authority or laws. Several sovereign citizen groups in the United
States produce fraudulent documents for their members in lieu of
legitimate government-issued forms of identification. Members have
been known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts
of violence and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist
goals.
They often target government officials and law enforcement. (also:
state citizens, freemen, preamble citizens, common law citizens)
[Domestic Extremism Lexicon, Dept. of Homeland Security Document
#IA-0233-09, p. 9; 18SOURCE:
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Crime/Terrorism/DomeExtrLexicon.pdf]
The
reason the groups mentioned would even feel the need to produce their
own ID’s is because you have made it impossible to procure ID or to
engage in commerce to support themselves without committing fraud
about their domicile or status on a government form, and without
signing up for government franchise in the process.
This
section therefore constitutes an affidavit of duress against the
unlawful and criminal forms of duress described herein.
The
existence of such duress renders void and of no legal effect all
evidence of consent or status derived from said consent, including
any and all government IDs in conflict with the status stated herein
or implying a citizenship or domicile different or inconsistent with
that described herein.
“An
agreement [including a franchise, because all franchises are
contracts] obtained by duress, coercion, or intimidation is invalid,
since the party coerced is not exercising his free will, and the test
is not so much the means by which the party is compelled to execute
the agreement as the state of mind induced. Duress, like fraud,
rarely becomes material,
except where a contract or conveyance has been made which the maker
wishes to avoid. As a general rule, duress renders the contract or
conveyance voidable, not void, at the option of the person coerced,
and it is susceptible of ratification. Like other voidable contracts,
it is valid until it is avoided by the person entitled to avoid it.
However, duress in the form of physical compulsion, in which a party
is caused to appear to assent when he has no intention of doing so,
is generally deemed to render the resulting purported contract void.
[American Jurisprudence 2d, Duress, §21 (1999)]
I
remind the recipient that any use of government ID, driver’s
licenses, and driver’s license applications as proof of domicile,
because the product of the crimes documented herein, is not
admissible as evidence pursuant to the fruit of a poisonous tree
doctrine. You cannot use the fruit of YOUR crime in kidnapping my
identity and as evidence against me in any civil or 4criminal
proceeding.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brown
v. Pierce, 74 U.S. 205, 7 Wall. 205, 19 L.Ed. 134
Barnette
v. Wells Fargo Nevada Nat'l Bank, 270 U.S. 438, 70 L.Ed. 669, 46
S.Ct. 326 (holding that acts induced by duress which operate solely
on the mind, and fall short of actual physical compulsion, are not
void at law, but are voidable only, at the election of him whose acts
were induced by it); Faske v. Gershman, 30 Misc.2d. 442, 215
N.Y.S.2d. 144; Glenney v. Crane (Tex Civ App Houston (1st Dist)), 352
S.W.2d. 773, writ ref n r e (May 16, 1962); Carroll v. Fetty, 121
W.Va. 215, 2 S.E.2d. 521, cert den 308 U.S. 571, 84 L.Ed. 479, 60
S.Ct. 85.
Faske
v. Gershman, 30 Misc.2d. 442, 215 N.Y.S.2d. 144; Heider v. Unicume,
142 or 416, 20 P.2d. 384; Glenney v. Crane (Tex Civ App Houston (1st
Dist)), 352 S.W.2d. 773, writ ref n r e (May 16, 1962)
Restatement
2d, Contracts § 174, stating that if conduct that appears to be a
manifestation of assent by a party who does not intend to engage in
that conduct is physically compelled by duress, the conduct is not
effective as a manifestation of assent.
If
you as the recipient would like to investigate the Government ID Scam
further and prosecute the perpetrators, see Ref. (1), Section 13. 2
Lastly,
the following affidavit of duress is hereby incorporated by reference
into this document. 3
Affidavit
of Duress: Illegal Tax Enforcement by De Facto Officers, Form #02.005
http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
ACTIONS
REQUESTED OF YOU AND YOUR RESPONSE
The
following subsections document specific actions requested of you to
ensure that your records are not inaccurate, false, or fraudulent and
to thereby prevent the crimes documented in this affidavit that
result from a FAILURE to take the action
Michael
Mincieli
CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT AGAINST THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Criminal
Complaint against those engaged in the Government ID Scam Recipient
of this legal notice is hereby formally requested to criminally
prosecute all those in the state government, federal government,
financial institutions, and employers who have instituted, protected,
sanctioned, or condoned the duress documented in attached affidavit
of duress against me personally under the following authorities
relating to compelled participation in government franchises and
identity theft:
1.
Compelled
Participation in Government Franchises:
1.1.
Thirteenth Amendment: Prohibition against involuntary Servitude.
I am being asked to represent a public office in the U.S. government
as a franchisee, that I am not eligible to occupy, cannot lawfully
occupy, and which I do not consent to occupy FOR ANY AMOUNT OF
COMPENSATION.
1.2.
18
U.S.C. 912: Impersonating a public officer.
A private person in possession, use, or control of public
property and engaging in a “trade or business” (“public office”
pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(26) is guilty of impersonating a public
officer. Those who only offer government ID to public officers are
indirectly compelling 3people to impersonate such officers.
1.3.
18 U.S.C. 654: Anyone who uses or compels the use of a public number
in connection with your private property without your consent is
guilty of conversion.
1.4.
42 U.S.C. 408(a)(8): Penalties
2.
Government ID Available Only to “U.S. persons” domiciled on
federal territory:
Includes
driver’s licenses and state ID that connect me with domicile on
federal territory and status as a statutory but not constitutional
“U.S. citizen”.
2.1.
18 U.S.C. 911: Impersonating a statutory “U.S. citizen”.
By compelling me to misrepresent my status as a statutory and not
constitutional “U.S. citizen” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1401 in
exchange for the Privilege of being able to conduct commerce using
government ID, those responsible are compelling me illegally to
impersonate a statutory but not constitutional “U.S. citizen”. 49
2.2.
42
U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)(i): Evidence, Procedure, and Certification for
payments.
2.3.
18
U.S.C. 1028(a)(7): Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information
2.4.
18 U.S.C. 1028A: Aggravated Identity Theft
2.5.
18
U.S.C. 1201: Kidnapping.
Whether I am physically moved or my legal identity is moved to a
foreign jurisdiction without my consent, the result is the same and
it is a crime.
If
you need legal authorities and memorandums of law useful for my
commercial prosecution arising out of compelled participation
in government franchises, the following should prove useful:
1.
Government Instituted Slavery Using Franchises,
Free9628.wordpress.com
2.
Why You Aren’t Eligible for Social Security, Free9628.wordpress.com
3.
Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee,
Free9628.wordpress.com
For
information on my prosecution of identity theft crimes
described herein, please see:
1.
Property and Privacy Protection Page, Section 10: Identity Theft
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/PropertyPrivacy/PropertyPrivacy.htm
2.
Prosecuting Social Security Number Misuse: Attacking Identity Theft
at its Source, U.S. Attorney Bulletin, Vol. 53, 20No. 1
3.
Identity Theft Laws: State Penalties and Remedies and Pending Federal
Bills, Congressional Research Service Report
If
you can’t even protect me from your own usurpation's, identity
theft, and kidnapping, it would be ridiculous to hire you as my
“protector” against other less injurious parties by becoming a
customer of your “protection racket” called a “citizen”,
“resident”, or “inhabitant”. When you have demonstrated a
sincere and ongoing desire to protect me from your own extortion and
adhesion contracts/franchises, and to
place me and my identity back on land protected by the Constitution
instead of on
federal
territory devoid of rights and constitutional protections, then and
only then will I consider politically and legally re- associating
with you by becoming a “citizen” or a “resident”.
"In
a free society, government protects citizens from threats against
their persons and property. In a police state, government deploys its
law enforcement assets to protect itself against the "threat"
posed by its own subjects." [W.N. Grigg]
Until
you quit acting like a de facto corporation, return us to lawful
money, eliminate the Federal Reserve, and return to your station as
the servant of the true sovereign, which is We the People and NOT the
government who serves them, then:
The
Declaration of Independence says you need my consent to “govern”
and that if you don’t have it, you are a tyrant and a terrorist. I
remind you that you don’t have my consent and therefore, the DHS
ought to be protecting me against you, not third parties. There are
only two types of governments:
A
Governments by consent;
B
Terrorist governments. Which one are you?
1.The
Declaration of Independence not only makes it my right, but my duty
to provide “better safeguards for my future security” because you
obviously can’t and won’t. Refusing to recognize my RIGHT and
DUTY to do so by becoming a foreign state an ambassador of the de
jure constitutional republic would simply be an interference with
that right and DUTY imposed by the organic law that is the foundation
of ALL of your lawful authority.
2.
I choose to be a “transient foreigner” and a “stateless person”
in relation to the de facto state and federal corporations that have
usurped and destroyed the original constitutional republic.
3.
All I want you to do is simply leave me alone, and not enforce your
fraudulent Ponzi scheme franchises or civil law against me. Since it
costs you nothing to be left alone, then it’s ridiculous to say
that I’m not “paying my fair share” for protection that I don’t
need, don’t want, and which I regard as harmful and not protective.
All that the present Corporation and Privatization of the
Government.,(FREE.9628.WORDPRESS.COM) seem to be inclined to
do with the money people send them now is protect their own criminal
“protection racket” enterprise.
4.
My sincerely held constitutionally protected First Amendment
religious convictions require me to separate from, not to fornicate
with, not participate in, nor do commerce with you until you reform
your ways. In that sense, I become a “church” and you become the
“state”, and the law must keep us separate. The Bible in fact
says my body is a temple, and I cannot pollute or corrupt that temple
by engaging in government harlotry.
"Do
you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Spirit of
God dwells in you?
If anyone defiles the temple of God, God will destroy him. For the
temple of God is holy, which temple you are." [1
Cor. 3:16-17, Bible, NKJV] 1And I heard another voice from heaven
saying, “Come out of her [the government BEAST,
Rev. 19:19], my people, lest you share in her sins, and lest you
receive of her plagues. For her sins have reached to heaven, and God
has remembered her iniquities. Render
to her just as she rendered to you [THEFT, LIES, TERRORISM, DECEIT,
and KIDNAPPING], and repay her double according to her works; in the
cup which she has mixed, mix double for her. In the measure that she
glorified herself and lived luxuriously [on STOLEN loot taken from
non-consenting “subjects”], in the same measure give her torment
and sorrow; for she says in her heart, ‘I sit as queen, and am no
widow, and will not see sorrow.’ Therefore her plagues will come in
one day?eath and mourning and famine. And she will be utterly burned
with fire, for strong is the Lord God who judges her. [Rev. 18:4-8,
Bible, NKJV]
Michael
Mincieli
